The six red flags, and why they work
The questions target structural signals rather than vibes: guaranteed income claims, a paid course with escalating upsells, recruitment-based rewards, no verifiable third-party results, manufactured urgency, and reselling a tool at a markup. Each one appears repeatedly in enforcement actions against 'passive income' schemes.
A single flag rarely means a scam. The pattern matters: guaranteed returns plus a course funnel plus referral bonuses is the classic shape of a scheme that regulators have already acted against.
What a good score actually looks like
Ideas that score well tend to involve selling a real skill or output to a real buyer: freelance services, niche content with an audience, or automation work for small businesses. They are slower than the promises, and they survive contact with an actual market.
Treat the score as a filter for where to spend your attention, not as a guarantee. The validator cannot verify a market, a demand curve, or your own persistence.
六项红旗指标为什么有效
这些问题针对的是结构性信号，而不是感觉：保证收益的承诺、带有层层追加销售的付费课程、以拉人头为基础的奖励、无法核实第三方成果、人为制造的紧迫感、以及加价转售工具。这些特征在针对“被动收入”骗局的执法案例中反复出现。
单项红旗很少等于骗局，重要的是组合：保证收益 + 课程漏斗 + 拉人返佣，正是监管机构已经出手处理过的典型形态。
高分项目长什么样
得分高的想法通常是向真实买家出售真实技能或成果：自由职业服务、有受众的细分内容，或为小企业做自动化。它们比承诺慢，但能经受真实市场的检验。
把分数当作分配注意力的筛子，而不是保证书。验证器无法核实市场、需求曲线，也无法核实你的坚持程度。